The UK has an excellent tradition of athletics-nerd statisticians tracking results, rankings, and much more. Luckily the track and field database, Power of 10, is available to provide answers to some often debated topics like:

  • What’s an equivalent 5k performance to 800?
  • How much help are super-shoes offering?
  • Which events are seeing the quickest improvement in times?

To answer the first question we can look at the time vs ranking plots for events within a single year. It’s not perfect, since there are several reasons why we might expect certain events to be stronger than others such as the availability of good races. A simple example would be comparing mile rankings to 5k rankings. Far fewer mile races exist, and far fewer people attempt to run a fast mile (compared to a fast 1500) so the strength in depth of mile rankings is unlikely to be equivalent to the 5k.

The plot below shows 1500m and 5k rankings from 2022.

Before vs After

Rankings comparison - 2022 - 5k vs 1500

A few interesting points

  • Those steps in the plot do seem to be around time barriers, perhaps the knowledge that a fast time is on really pushes people in those final laps.
  • The top 20 really differentiate themselves - anecdotally it seems most of these times come from fast races abroad
  • 14:00 ~= 3:43.6 and 15:00 ~=3:55.6.
  • It seems like being close to a time barrier (ie 14mins for 5k) can help push times below the curve.